Article source In order to accurately quantify audio virtue Crew a total

Informations Exams web 2.0 software Model Wifi Subscribers

Matchless Testing Algorithms Give COMARCO Bluetooth Try on Resolutions A client View point.

Enterprise Editors/High-Tech Authors
IRVINE,. 30, 2003
VQuad 's the industry's first and just in a commercial sense completely ready algorithm for assessing the virtue of loading video from a user's stand point. It editions many aspects of human spectacle, and might accurately mimic perceptual phenomena namely overlaying and contrast sensitivity. The outflow of the video try on is actually a interrelated MOS (Mean Idea Score) value blended with info namely block distortion, blurring, edge busyness, jerkiness and noise. Also, the interrelated audio, and indeed video/audio synchronization is classified.
To conduct the try on, useful resource video sequences are transmitted throughout the affiliation. At the receiving finale, the transmitted sequences are caught and objectively inspected by perceptual comparability with the useful resource sequences.
Voice Try on Editions Human Listening
In order to accurately quantify audio virtue, Crew, a total household of proprietary algorithms,. Crew evaluates the general audio virtue considering all elemental factors having an influence on audio virtue degradation and is ready to identify where and that factors are contributing to degradation. Specialised algorithms are completely ready for scrutinizing clear speech, noise suppressors, and echo cancellers (SQuad-LQ, SQuad-NS, and SQuad-ECP, respectively). Matchless to these algorithms is their capability to generate informations which specifies the sources of audio virtue impairments together with a Mean Idea Score (MOS) of the audio. These exams are all based on a fundamental perceptual label of human listening.

As well as that about the video and audio virtue algorithms,. Text message, MMS, HTTP Reading through utilizing MS Web browser, e-mail utilizing MS Outlook, and downloading archives utilizing File transfer protocol or UDP are a subset of the completely ready informations exams. Like with the video and audio algorithms, substantial numbers of informations are assembled to supply the tote with the engineering info required to know the source of impairments to informations virtue.
," declares Greg Maton, senior vice chairman of COMARCO. "We're also the initial to honestly measure MMS performance, at a period when messaging is transforming into a increasing numbers of publicly hunted trait."

. The try on household is actually a mobile try on platform that's adaptable to just about any try on application. It offers bluetooth infrastructure diagnostic, benchmarking and optimisation for 2G,.
This Site algorithms. It is the perfect entry-level http://mp3kafesi.net/ product, eligible of
optimise them. Duo helps with up to 2 Telephoning Modules, that
could possibly have blended technological innovations, and one Multi-Band, Multiple-
Invention RF Scanner. A Portability The gear is completely ready for
chassis. Multi chassis may be merged to let for pretty much
96 Telephoning Modules. The client could combine and match
. The web 2.0 tutorial information Interface consists of a
. Availableness is instantaneous.
About COMARCO Additional Info
Based in Irvine, Calif., Comarco is actually a leading supplier of bluetooth try on resolutions for pasture try on applications, ChargeSource(R) global mobile strength commodities and bluetooth urgency call box systems. , video and informations benchmarking and system optimisation utilizing advanced QoS algorithms and an individual multi-technology RF scanner..
Based on expressed year-to-date sales informations, ChargeSource 's the broadest merchandising queue of goods capable to revitalise and strength plenty of cellular devices, consisting of netbooks, mobile telephones, electronical cams, PDAs and other handheld items, by using a unmarried energy source. Targus Multinational, the top provider of laptop pc attachments in this world, 's the exceptional dispenser of ChargeSource commodities to high of the country's leading shopper gadgets boutiques.
As well as that,...
Recommended Reading Safe Harbor Declaration
This disclose might include forward-looking statements that're made pursuant about the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Personal Securities Legal case Reform Act of 1995, as amended to date. These forward-looking statements encircle dangers, doubts, and other factors which may bring on factual results or final results to vary materially from those meditated by the forward-looking statements. Loads of critical indicators might cause our results to vary materially from those displayed by these forward-looking statements, consisting of, among others, the affect of perceived or factual worsening of financial conditions on customers' and prospective customers' adoption of new bluetooth communications technological innovations, and, so,, investing in our commodities and services; dangers connected with superstore consent of our commodities and our capability to meet contractual and mechanic product performance commitments with our clients; performances by us and others with regard to defence of highbrow property; and competitors' disclose of contested commodities and other actions. More info on certainly likely factors which may impact our fiscal results are incorporated in dangers descriptive now and again in our Securities and Transfer Commission filings, consisting of without restriction our yearly report on Form 10-K for the 365 days finished Jan 31, 2003 and Form 10-Q for the quarter finished July 31, 2003.
Corporate Info
COMARCO Bluetooth Try on Resolutions is placed at 2 Cromwell, Irvine, CA 92618-1816..
Note to Publishers: Electronical photos of the hardware, and indeed screen catches are completely ready upon request.

1999 2000 86 2001 69

2001 BASIC-SKILLS Exams; 10th-grade; Outcomes of basic-skills noting tests.(NEWS)

The effects
These are the 10th-grade noting try on results for schools within the 13-county metro region. Starting off this 365 days, all public-school learners in Minnesota must pass this try on to graduate.
For districts with results for just one school, scores and demographics for which school are listed. For districts with more than one school, district informations are likewise incorporated.
To the try on
Learners wrote a composition on a unmarried subject. The try on is ranked on a 1-6 scale, and a score of three or taller is required to met the criteria for graduation.
NCS Pearson , an independent product owner, ranked the try on.
Who's examined?
Most of all public-school 10th-graders are examined. Some learners in special-education or English-language programs may be exempted, or could take the equivalent try on with adaptations, namely larger kind.
- . Incorporated are links about the state Division of youngsters, Families and Learning, that has statewide results.
To graduate, learners must pass the text try on and rudimentary ability exams in reading and math. Results for the reading and math exams were leaked out April 18.
Key to icons
## - Nontraditional schools,.
# - Nontraditional schools whose results aren't incorporated in district averages. Consists therapy programs and correctional facilities.
Metro-area public schools
.

-- District/ - School name

-- Annandale

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 87% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 16% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- Anoka-Hennepin

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 87% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 2% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Anoka

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Anthony Louis Apartment #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 63% 2001: 88%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 63%



-- District/ - School name

- Bell Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 50% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 33% Spec. ed.: 89% LEP: 0% Mob.: 33%



-- District/ - School name

- Blaine

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 87% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 2% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Champlin Park

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 91% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 5% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 25%



-- District/ - School name

- Coon Rapids

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Crossroads Replacement ##

Noting % passed

1999: 52% 2000: 64% 2001: 74%

Demographics

Pov.: 32% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 4% Mob.: 17%



-- District/ - School name

- New Connections #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- College Creek Site ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 43% 2001: 60%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 40% Mob.: 60%



-- District/ - School name

-- Becker

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 88% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- Belle Plaine

Noting % passed

1999: 93% 2000: 95% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 2%



-- District/ - School name

-- Large Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 84% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 4% LEP: 1% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

-- Bloomington

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 92% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 16% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 4% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Jefferson

Noting % passed

1999: 95% 2000: 97% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 0% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

- Kennedy

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 86% 2001: 88%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 8% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Southwood Babyhood

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 80%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 40%



-- District/ - School name

-- Braham

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 77% 2001: 87%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 0% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

-- Brooklyn Centre

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 76% 2001: 81%

Demographics

Pov.: 51% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 11% Mob.: 21%



-- District/ - School name

-- Buffalo

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Program ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- Buffalo

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Burnsville

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 89% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 2% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Anthony Louis Day Therapy #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- Behavior Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 33% 2000: 40% 2001: 58%

Demographics

Pov.: 58% Spec. ed.: 92% LEP: 8% Mob.: 17%



-- District/ - School name

- Burnsville

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 89% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 2% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- Cambridge-Isanti

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 88% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Centennial

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 90% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 4% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Anoka Teenager Centre #

Noting % passed

1999: 38% 2000: 58% 2001: 81%

Demographics

Pov.: 30% Spec. ed.: 38% LEP: 0% Mob.: 74%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 67% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Centennial

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 90% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 4% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Chaska

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 2% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Chisago Wetlands

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 88% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Chisago Wetlands

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 89% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Trio Program

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 80% 2001: 90%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 40%



-- District/ - School name

-- Columbia Altitudes

Noting % passed

1999: 77% 2000: 82% 2001: 85%

Demographics

Pov.: 23% Spec. ed.: 15% LEP: 3% Mob.: 12%



-- District/ - School name

- Columbia Altitudes

Noting % passed

1999: 77% 2000: 82% 2001: 85%

Demographics

Pov.: 21% Spec. ed.: 15% LEP: 3% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Columbia Altitudes Sr.. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 45% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 0% Mob.: 18%



-- District/ - School name

-- Dassel-Cokato

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 89% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Dassel-Cokato

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 90% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 15% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Dassel-Cokato Replacement ##

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 88% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

-- Delano

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 92% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- Eden Prairie

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 94% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 2% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Edina

Noting % passed

1999: 97% 2000: 96% 2001: 99%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Edina

Noting % passed

1999: 97% 2000: 96% 2001: 99%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Sobriety ##

Noting % passed

1999: 100% 2000: 92% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

-- Elk River

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 92% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Elk River

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 93% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Ivan Sand ##

Noting % passed

1999: 57% 2000: 78% 2001: 71%

Demographics

Pov.: 43% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

-- Farmington

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 88% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 1% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 40% Spec. ed.: 20% LEP: 0% Mob.: 20%



-- District/ - School name

- Farmington

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 87% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 1% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

-- Forest Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 87% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 60% 2000: 60% 2001: 86%

Demographics

Pov.: 32% Spec. ed.: 23% LEP: 0% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Forest Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 88% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- Fridley

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 86% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 19% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 2% Mob.: 13%



-- District/ - School name

- Fridley

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 86% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 19% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 2% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 78% 2001: 89%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 44%



-- District/ - School name

-- Glencoe-Silver Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 84% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Hastings

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Harbor Lee Program #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 75%



-- District/ - School name

- Hastings

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Hopkins

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 93% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 5% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Delta #

Noting % passed

1999: 71% 2000: 67% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 100% LEP: 0% Mob.: 60%



-- District/ - School name

- Hennepin Home School-Alpha #

Noting % passed

1999: 60% 2000: 60% 2001: 62%

Demographics

Pov.: 38% Spec. ed.: 51% LEP: 2% Mob.: 77%



-- District/ - School name

- Hennepin Home School-Beta #

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 60% 2001: 33%

Demographics

Pov.: 33% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 33%



-- District/ - School name

- Hopkins Senior

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 93% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 5% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- New Relation #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



-- District/ - School name

- Omegon #

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 92% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 22% LEP: 0% Mob.: 78%



-- District/ - School name

-- Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 89% 2001: 86%

Demographics

Pov.: 15% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Hutchinson

Noting % passed

1999: 95% 2000: 96% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 2%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: -% 2001: 78%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 22% LEP: 0% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Hutchinson

Noting % passed

1999: 95% 2000: 96% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 1% Mob.: 2%



-- District/ - School name

-- Inver Grove

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Jordan

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 86% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Lakeville

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 92% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 2% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Lakeville

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 92% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 1% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Lakeville Adult Rudimentary Ed. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 43% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 38% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 63%



-- District/ - School name

-- Lester Prairie

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 94% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 5% Spec. ed.: 3% LEP: 0% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

-- Mahtomedi

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 90% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Replacement School ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 25% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 67%



-- District/ - School name

- Mahtomedi

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 91% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Maple Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 81% 2000: 88% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 15% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

-- Minneapolis

Noting % passed

1999: 59% 2000: 61% 2001: 73%

Demographics

Pov.: 55% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 21% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Abbott Northwestern #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 67% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



-- District/ - School name

- Abraham Lincoln ##

Noting % passed

1999: 4% 2000: 21% 2001: 56%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 67% Mob.: 33%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 36% 2001: 60%

Demographics

Pov.: 80% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 20%



-- District/ - School name

- Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 13% 2000: 36% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 67% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- City Inc. Northern ##

Noting % passed

1999: 41% 2000: 45% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 86% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 14% Mob.: 14%



-- District/ - School name

- City Inc. South ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 87% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 27% Mob.: 27%



-- District/ - School name

- Relation Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 67% 2000: 52% 2001: 70%

Demographics

Pov.: 52% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 52%



-- District/ - School name

- Crawford First ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 40%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 100% LEP: 0% Mob.: 20%



-- District/ - School name

- Edison

Noting % passed

1999: 41% 2000: 57% 2001: 64%

Demographics

Pov.: 63% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 39% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: 25% 2000: 50% 2001: 70%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

- Arms On ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 47% 2001: 40%

Demographics

Pov.: 80% Spec. ed.: 40% LEP: 40% Mob.: 20%



-- District/ - School name

- Harrison ##

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 14% 2001: 33%

Demographics

Pov.: 67% Spec. ed.: 100% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Hennepin Teenager Centre #

Noting % passed

1999: 57% 2000: 50% 2001: 42%

Demographics

Pov.: 33% Spec. ed.: 33% LEP: 8% Mob.: 42%



-- District/ - School name

- Henry

Noting % passed

1999: 55% 2000: 56% 2001: 73%

Demographics

Pov.: 74% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 21% Mob.: 12%



-- District/ - School name

- Intensive Day Therapy ##

Noting % passed

1999: 40% 2000: 67% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 57% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 14% Mob.: 36%



-- District/ - School name

- Katahdin ##

Noting % passed

1999: 60% 2000: 80% 2001: 83%

Demographics

Pov.: 67% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 17%



-- District/ - School name

- Loring-Nicollet ##

Noting % passed

1999: 83% 2000: 62% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 17% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: 56% 2000: 67% 2001: 88%

Demographics

Pov.: 71% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 12% Mob.: 18%



-- District/ - School name

- Menlo Park ##

Noting % passed

1999: 65% 2000: 79% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 53% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 27%



-- District/ - School name

- Minnesota Adolescent Challenge ##

Noting % passed

1999: 75% 2000: 85% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 43% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 71%



-- District/ - School name

- New Views ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Northern

Noting % passed

1999: 52% 2000: 50% 2001: 70%

Demographics

Pov.: 67% Spec. ed.: 16% LEP: 14% Mob.: 14%



-- District/ - School name

- Operation De Novo ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 31% 2001: 20%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 20% LEP: 20% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

-. High School ##

Noting % passed

1999: 75% 2000: 69% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Pease Academy-Holos ##

Noting % passed

1999: 78% 2000: 64% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 42% Spec. ed.: 17% LEP: 0% Mob.: 25%



-- District/ - School name

- Plymouth Young people Center-Capri ##

Noting % passed

1999: 37% 2000: 28% 2001: 47%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Plymouth Young people Center-Lyndale ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 86%

Demographics

Pov.: 71% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 21% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Roosevelt

Noting % passed

1999: 45% 2000: 49% 2001: 68%

Demographics

Pov.: 70% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 35% Mob.: 12%



-- District/ - School name

- South

Noting % passed

1999: 84% 2000: 84% 2001: 84%

Demographics

Pov.: 34% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 11% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Southwest

Noting % passed

1999: 66% 2000: 69% 2001: 69%

Demographics

Pov.: 32% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 27% Mob.: 13%



-- District/ - School name

- University-Day Community #

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 33% 2001: 83%

Demographics

Pov.: 33% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 67%



-- District/ - School name

- Metropolitan League St. Academy ##

Noting % passed

1999: 45% 2000: 44% 2001: 40%

Demographics

Pov.: 80% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

- Volunteers of America-High ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 80% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 7% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Washburn

Noting % passed

1999: 68% 2000: 71% 2001: 83%

Demographics

Pov.: 42% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 11% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Work Occasion Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 53% 2000: 35% 2001: 77%

Demographics

Pov.: 87% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 26% Mob.: 16%



-- District/ - School name

- Young people Diversion Truancy ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 75% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

-- Minnetonka

Noting % passed

1999: 95% 2000: 95% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 2% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Montgomery-Lonsdale

Noting % passed

1999: 81% 2000: 91% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 15% Spec. ed.: 4% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Monticello

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Monticello

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 94% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Monticello Replacement ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 50% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 40% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 20%



-- District/ - School name

-- Piles View

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 92% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 63% 2000: 79% 2001: 74%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 22% LEP: 0% Mob.: 44%



-- District/ - School name

- Irondale

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 90% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 2% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Piles View

Noting % passed

1999: 96% 2000: 97% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 2%



-- District/ - School name

- Oak Grove Special Schooling ##

Noting % passed

1999: 67% 2000: 50% 2001: 64%

Demographics

Pov.: 36% Spec. ed.: 100% LEP: 0% Mob.: 64%



-- District/ - School name

- Shared Time ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 80% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 67% LEP: 0% Mob.: 67%



-- District/ - School name

-- New Prague

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 93% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Northern Branch

Noting % passed

1999: 80% 2000: 87% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 0% Mob.: 13%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 74% 2000: 70% 2001: 81%

Demographics

Pov.: 19% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 13%



-- District/ - School name

- Distance education Program

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 89%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 67%



-- District/ - School name

- Northern Branch

Noting % passed

1999: 81% 2000: 87% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 0% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

-- Northern St. Paul-Maplewood

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 84% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Northern

Noting % passed

1999: 83% 2000: 85% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 2% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Tartan

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 84% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- Northfield

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 90% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 2% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Replacement Learning Program ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 44% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 40% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 20% Mob.: 40%



-- District/ - School name

- Northfield

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 92% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 2% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- Norwood

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 87% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 0% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Central

Noting % passed

1999: 93% 2000: 88% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 15% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-. ##

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 77% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 71%



-- District/ - School name

-- Orono

Noting % passed

1999: 94% 2000: 92% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 3% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 2%



-- District/ - School name

-- Osseo

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 4% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

- Maple Grove

Noting % passed

1999: 94% 2000: 94% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 4% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Osseo

Noting % passed

1999: 83% 2000: 85% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 4% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Park Centre

Noting % passed

1999: 81% 2000: 82% 2001: 83%

Demographics

Pov.: 29% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 9% Mob.: 17%



-- District/ - School name

-- Princeton

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 80% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 16% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

-- Previous Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 94% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 1% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- Randolph

Noting % passed

1999: 76% 2000: 85% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- Richfield

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 85% 2001: 84%

Demographics

Pov.: 21% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 6% Mob.: 14%



-- District/ - School name

-- Robbinsdale

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 86% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 16% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 3% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Armstrong

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 89% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 7% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Cooper

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 82% 2001: 90%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

- Winnetka #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 89%

Demographics

Pov.: 56% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 22%



-- District/ - School name

-- Rockford

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 84% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

-- Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 91% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Tangerine Valley

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 93% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 1% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 77% 2001: 87%

Demographics

Pov.: 23% Spec. ed.: 36% LEP: 0% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

- Eagan

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 91% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 2% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Eastview

Noting % passed

1999: 91% 2000: 91% 2001: 99%

Demographics

Pov.: 5% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 0% Mob.: 3%



-- District/ - School name

- Academic Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 39% 2000: 36% 2001: 62%

Demographics

Pov.: 23% Spec. ed.: 92% LEP: 0% Mob.: 15%



-- District/ - School name

- Harbor Lee South ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 50% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



-- District/ - School name

- Rosemount

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 89% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 1% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

-- Roseville

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 91% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 2% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Run City

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 90% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 22% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 0% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Run City

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 90% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 23% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Trio Program

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 100% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

-- Shakopee

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 85% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 19% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 4% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- South St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 85% 2000: 90% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 16% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 56% 2000: 80% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 43%



-- District/ - School name

- South St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 91% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 14% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- South Washington County

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 88% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 8% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Replacement Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 38% 2000: 55% 2001: 83%

Demographics

Pov.: 28% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Park

Noting % passed

1999: 84% 2000: 86% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 9% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Woodbury

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 92% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 5% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- Springtime Pond Park

Noting % passed

1999: 87% 2000: 87% 2001: 93%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 2% Mob.: 11%



-- District/ - School name

- Distance education Ind. Learn

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



-- District/ - School name

- Springtime Pond Park

Noting % passed

1999: 88% 2000: 88% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 2% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

- Springtime Pond Park Replacement ##

Noting % passed

1999: 68% 2000: 58% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 31% Spec. ed.: 19% LEP: 0% Mob.: 13%



-- District/ - School name

-- St. Anthony-New Brighton

Noting % passed

1999: 97% 2000: 95% 2001: 97%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 5% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- St. Francis

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 89% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Crossroads #

Noting % passed

1999: 33% 2000: 61% 2001: 76%

Demographics

Pov.: 66% Spec. ed.: 86% LEP: 0% Mob.: 66%



-- District/ - School name

- St. Francis

Noting % passed

1999: 86% 2000: 89% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- St. Louis Park

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 89% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 4% Mob.: 7%



-- District/ - School name

-- St. Michael-Albertville

Noting % passed

1999: 84% 2000: 88% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 7% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

-- St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 63% 2000: 68% 2001: 77%

Demographics

Pov.: 55% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 38% Mob.: 10%



-- District/ - School name

-. #

Noting % passed

1999: 44% 2000: 35% 2001: 85%

Demographics

Pov.: 85% Spec. ed.: 15% LEP: 46% Mob.: 15%



-- District/ - School name

-. Community School ##

Noting % passed

1999: 75% 2000: 50% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 33% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 33% Mob.: 33%



-- District/ - School name

-. Ingenious Arts School ##

Noting % passed

1999: 82% 2000: 50% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 13% Mob.: 25%



-- District/ - School name

-. Raw Begin ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 75% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 25% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

-. Jump ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 4% 2001: 25%

Demographics

Pov.: 90% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 95% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- Arlington

Noting % passed

1999: 48% 2000: 57% 2001: 57%

Demographics

Pov.: 74% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 44% Mob.: 23%



-- District/ - School name

- Arlington Apartment ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 75% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 25%



-- District/ - School name

- Fellas Totem The city #

Noting % passed

1999: 31% 2000: 34% 2001: 59%

Demographics

Pov.: 64% Spec. ed.: 23% LEP: 27% Mob.: 14%



-- District/ - School name

- Central

Noting % passed

1999: 84% 2000: 83% 2001: 91%

Demographics

Pov.: 41% Spec. ed.: 4% LEP: 25% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Como Park

Noting % passed

1999: 62% 2000: 66% 2001: 84%

Demographics

Pov.: 59% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 46% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

- Concentrate Above ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 25%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Guadalupe Replacement ##

Noting % passed

1999: 26% 2000: 68% 2001: 62%

Demographics

Pov.: 32% Spec. ed.: 16% LEP: 41% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

- Harding

Noting % passed


1999: 63% 2000: 66% 2001: 77%

Demographics

Pov.: 57% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 45% Mob.: 9%



-- District/ - School name

- Highland Park

Noting % passed

1999: 62% 2000: 69% 2001: 81%

Demographics

Pov.: 40% Spec. ed.: 13% LEP: 30% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Humboldt

Noting % passed

1999: 49% 2000: 58% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 65% Spec. ed.: 15% LEP: 44% Mob.: 15%



-- District/ - School name

- Johnson

Noting % passed

1999: 63% 2000: 74% 2001: 78%

Demographics

Pov.: 60% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 36% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Teenager Horizons (Wilder) ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 71% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 100% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 33% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- Riverside Special Schooling ##

Noting % passed

1999: 61% 2000: 80% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 0%



-- District/ - School name

- St.. ##

Noting % passed

1999: 41% 2000: -% 2001: 63%

Demographics

Pov.: 38% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 38% Mob.: 38%



-- District/ - School name

- St. Paul Open

Noting % passed

1999: 74% 2000: 69% 2001: 89%

Demographics

Pov.: 47% Spec. ed.: 16% LEP: 21% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

- Conversion for fulfillment ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 29% 2001: 67%

Demographics

Pov.: 61% Spec. ed.: 39% LEP: 11% Mob.: 33%



-- District/ - School name

- Usa Clinic Teen #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 50% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 50% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



-- District/ - School name

-- Stillwater

Noting % passed

1999: 93% 2000: 92% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Harbor Lee #

Noting % passed

1999: 50% 2000: 100% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 25% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 75%



-- District/ - School name

- Place #

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 33% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 75% Spec. ed.: 75% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- St.. ##

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



-- District/ - School name

- Stillwater

Noting % passed

1999: 93% 2000: 92% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- W. St..: 5% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 3% Mob.: 5%



-- District/ - School name

-- Waconia

Noting % passed

1999: 79% 2000: 89% 2001: 95%

Demographics

Pov.: 6% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 1% Mob.: 6%



-- District/ - School name

-- Watertown-Mayer

Noting % passed

1999: 92% 2000: 95% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 12% Spec. ed.: 6% LEP: 0% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- Wayzata

Noting % passed

1999: 95% 2000: 98% 2001: 98%

Demographics

Pov.: 4% Spec. ed.: 7% LEP: 1% Mob.: 8%



-- District/ - School name

-- West Metro Schooling District

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 47% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 14%



-- District/ - School name

-- Westonka

Noting % passed

1999: 90% 2000: 96% 2001: 94%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 11% LEP: 0% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

-- White Bear Pond

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 87% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 11% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%



-- District/ - School name

- Region Learning Centre ##

Noting % passed

1999: 40% 2000: 61% 2001: 82%

Demographics

Pov.: 55% Spec. ed.: 18% LEP: 0% Mob.: 45%



-- District/ - School name

- White Bear Northern

Noting % passed

1999: 89% 2000: 88% 2001: 96%

Demographics

Pov.: 10% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 1% Mob.: 4%


Constitution schools
Constitution schools are state-funded schools rush by instructors and mum and dad quite than by public school districts.
.

School name/City

City Academy / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 45%

Demographics

Pov.: 82% Spec. ed.: 9% LEP: 9% Mob.: 82%



School name/City

Community of Peace Acad. / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 60%

Demographics

Pov.: 80% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 25% Mob.: 20%



School name/City

Coon Rapids Learning Centre

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 75% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 22% LEP: 0% Mob.: 100%



School name/City

Head to head Academy / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 42% 2001: 70%

Demographics

Pov.: 70% Spec. ed.: 20% LEP: 10% Mob.: 90%



School name/City

Four Instructions / Minneapolis

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 57% 2001: 79%

Demographics

Pov.: 86% Spec. ed.: 14% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



School name/City

Heart of the planet / Minneapolis

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 86% 2001: 69%

Demographics

Pov.: 85% Spec. ed.: 23% LEP: 0% Mob.: 15%



School name/City

High School for Rec. Arts / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 17% 2000: 56% 2001: 71%

Demographics

Pov.: 59% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 0% Mob.: 71%



School name/City

Taller Ground Academy / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 75%

Demographics

Pov.: 58% Spec. ed.: 8% LEP: 0% Mob.: 42%



School name/City

Math & Science Acad. / Woodbury

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 12% LEP: 0% Mob.: 16%



School name/City

Minnesota Invention / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 45% 2000: 84% 2001: 88%

Demographics

Pov.: 35% Spec. ed.: 29% LEP: 0% Mob.: 53%



School name/City

Minnesota Transitions / Minneapolis

Noting % passed

1999: 58% 2000: 70% 2001: 77%

Demographics

Pov.: 95% Spec. ed.: 27% LEP: 0% Mob.: 41%



School name/City

New Altitudes / Stillwater

Noting % passed

1999: 68% 2000: 100% 2001: 77%

Demographics

Pov.: 15% Spec. ed.: 31% LEP: 0% Mob.: 38%



School name/City

Odyssey / Brooklyn Park

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 100% 2001: 88%

Demographics

Pov.: 13% Spec. ed.: 25% LEP: 0% Mob.: 25%



School name/City

Pact / Anoka

Noting % passed

1999: 81% 2000: 71% 2001: 92%

Demographics

Pov.: 0% Spec. ed.: 17% LEP: 0% Mob.: 38%



School name/City

Ability for The next day to come / St. Paul

Noting % passed

1999: 64% 2000: 66% 2001: 52%

Demographics

Pov.: 65% Spec. ed.: 16% LEP: 3% Mob.: 81%



School name/City

Ideas for Accomplishment / St. Paul


.-White Bear Audio-video. Senior

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 0% LEP: 0% Mob.: 75%



Ideas for Accomplishment

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: 67% 2001: 50%

Demographics

Pov.: 50% Spec. ed.: 33% LEP: 0% Mob.: 50%



School name/City

Small town School of Northfield

Noting % passed

1999: -% 2000: -% 2001: 100%

Demographics

Pov.: 20% Spec. ed.: 10% LEP: 0% Mob.: 40%
Personal schools
Personal and parochial schools aren't required to provide the noting try on or to report results. Those listed here expressed testing at the minimum 90 p'cent of 10th-graders. Personal schools are likewise not essential to report demographics.
.

% passed

School name / City 1999 2000 2001



Academy of Sacred Angels / Richfield 97 98 99

Benilde-St. Margaret's / St. Louis Park 93 97 A hundred

Christ's Family of religion / St. Paul - A hundred 91

De La Salle / Minneapolis - - 99

Groves Academy / St. Louis Park - 89 82

Hill-Murray / Maplewood - 98 A hundred

St. Thomas Academy / St. Paul - 98 99

Totino Elegance / Fridley 94 96 A hundred
School rankings
The lists below show Minnesota school districts with few of the best and worst results on this past state noting exams. Just those districts with 35 or maybe more 10th-graders were contained in the diagnostic.
.

Biggest gainers

% % % %

. LEP Pov. Mob.



District: Fulda

School: Fulda 98 76 22 13 0 19 0



District: Cass Pond

School: Cass Pond 91 69 22 22 0 51 13



District: Clearbrook-Gonvick

School: Clearbrook-Gonvick Securities and exchange commission's. A hundred 80 20 11 0 38 4



District: Minneapolis

School: Northern 70 50 20 16 14 67 14



District: Madelia

School: Madelia 96 76 20 13 7 35 7



District: St. Paul

School: St. Paul Open 89 69 20 16 21 47 5



District: Pipestone-Jasper

School: Pipestone 97 77 20 9 0 18 3



District: Minneapolis

School: Roosevelt 68 49 19 13 35 70 A dozen



District: St. Paul

School: Como Park 84 66 18 11 46 59 6



District: Red Pond

School: Red Pond 75 57 18 7 0 91 11





Biggest losers

% % % %

. LEP Pov. Mob.



District: Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton

School: Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton 85 94 -9 7 1 20 4



District: Nevis

School: Nevis 86 93 -7 6 0 45 A dozen



District: Wrenshall

School: Wrenshall 86 93 -7 7 0 34 11



District: Pierz

School: Healy 84 91 -7 9 0 33 8



District: Wabasso

School: Wabasso 89 96 -7 9 0 26 4



District: Wheaton

School: Wheaton 91 98 -7 9 0 30 7



District: Invasion Pond

School: Invasion Pond 84 91 -7 18 0 32 4



District: Canby

School: Canby 92 97 -5 10 0 35 4



District: Henning

School: Henning 90 95 -5 23 0 31 3



District: Foley

School: Foley 90 94 -4 A dozen 0 17 5



District: Multinational Tumbles

School: Tumbles 86 90 -4 15 0 17 9



District: McLeod West

School: McLeod West 94 98 -4 6 0 14 8



District: Pine River-Backus

School: Pine River 83 87 -4 19 0 30 5



District: Maple River

School: Maple River 95 99 -4 19 0 22 6
How learners in numerous groupings functioned
All Minnesota 10th-graders did better on this past noting try on, especially small section learners and the ones within the at-risk classifications of special schooling, limited English, low-income and mobile learners. These numerals represent dying percentages.
.

1999 2000 2001

Am. Ind. 66% 70% 82%

Oriental 62% 69% 80%

Hispanic 63% 64% 73%

Black 51% 54% 66%

White 88% 90% 95%

Spec. ed. 43% 50% 66%

Limited Eng. 31% 39% 53%

Low-income 67% 70% 79%

Unfamiliar with district 68% 72% 80%
Source: Minnesota Division of youngsters, Families and Learning